If you point out glaring errors I will not use them anymore.
good point with the grass blade I have never seen anybody make a blade of grass. Have you seen anybody make one species into another?

Sorry I never qualified my statements on evolution. I am not disputing microevolution, only macro. Micro can and is observed no argument here. Macro is where my problem is.

thanks in advance for answering the questions.

Does it really make any difference to him when the glaring errors in his knowledge are pointed out … probably not but you can hope.

This is where I find the arrogance rears its head. Not only is there no proof for a creator type god, the poster has a complete inability to believe that anyone could think that the only creator type god is his version of god.

@Francesc

“1 per 1000 is an incredible high rate for an impossible thing, isn’t it?”

That must mean you’re interpreting the evidence incorrectly. The poster just has a different worldview from yours and you’re persecuting him if you don’t agree that his version of mumbo-jumbo is incorrect.

From wikipedia: “The incidence of Down syndrome is estimated at one per 800 to one per 1000 births.[52] In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated the rate as one per 733 live births in the United States (5429 new cases per year).[53] Approximately 95% of these are trisomy 21. Down syndrome occurs in all ethnic groups and among all economic classes”

1 per 1000 is an incredible high rate for an impossible thing, isn’t it? Down’s syndrome is only one particular change in our DNA (”is a chromosomal disorder caused by the presence of all or part of an extra 21st chromosome”)

Not just any old designer but his version of a designer, although he seems totally incapable of explaining why any of this is true.

Unfortunately, this is not only an argument from ignorance / argument from lack of imagination, there is another explanation of how you might get complexity from simplicity without design. It’s called “evolution by natural selection”. Modern evolutionary synthesis is fantastically detailed. There are no competing theories. Evolution definitely happened. Creation definitely did not. This is confirmed by evidence to a similar degree that “the Sun is bigger than the Earth” is confirmed. It’s a fact.

Have you ever met a painter, have you ever seen a painter? Have you ever seen someone who makes grass? So your proof is nothing of the sort. Hint: proof is not claiming godditit because you don’t understand something.

“it doesnt matter that that 3 % contains such a massive amout of information that even if you had 1 mutation per generation it would take to long for it to work with how old they say the earth is,”

Please provide evidence that this is true.

“I tell you about my savior and you say “all Gods are the same” …”

No I asked why you version of mumbo-jumbo is correct and other versions of mumbo-jumbo are incorrect and you answer (if you can call it that) was because your religion has a saviour. Please explain why you think this answers the question.

“Yet I’m still hear happy in my God given bliss that I dont have to blindly stumble through life hoping I dont fall at the feet of a living God when I die.”

Wishful thinking doesn’t make something true.

“still I hear “there is no God””

Well provide some evidence for you god’s existence then … you’ve claimed more than once that you have evidence but have posted nothing of the sort. Someone could use much the same “proofs” as you have to prove that [insert name of god here] exists but you don’t believe in other gods do you, so why not?

It makes me so happy that I can cause you to laugh so much.

Dont get me wrong I love to answer your questions, but do you think you could at least answer one yourself.

It is amazing how proof shown is proof denied. If I showed you a painting, would you say there is no painter? There is enough proof in one blade of grass to prove a creator. You look at it and state “there is no God” Somebody tells you that life comes from nothing and blindly you say “there is no God” It makes no difference that when the theory was written a cell was thought to be not much more that goo “there is no God” Now we can see inside and realize how complex it really is “there is no God” We see men so desperate to make it work that they fake ape men from teeth and single bones, just making up dates to fit there needs “there is no God” It doesnt matter that DNA profreads itself guarding against mutation “there is no God” the chimp is only 3 % away from us they say, it doesnt matter that that 3 % contains such a massive amout of information that even if you had 1 mutation per generation it would take to long for it to work with how old they say the earth is, still “there is no God”

I tell you about my savior and you say “all Gods are the same” Look up Tyre, It wont matter that it was fortold 200 years before it happend, where? The Bible “all Gods are the same” God tells the truth, not men living on the moon dressing like quakers (brigham young prophacy from morman non god) “all Gods are the same” The bible is writen by many people over the span of many year from many countries all speaking of the same God, not a single person easily deceaved “all Gods are the same”

Yet I’m still hear happy in my God given bliss that I dont have to blindly stumble through life hoping I dont fall at the feet of a living God when I die. still I hear “there is no God”

*laughter* … do you actually know what the word proof means; really get a dictionary and look up the meaning as it’s certainly not what you think it is. You claimed that the signature of god (or some such mumbo-jumbo) was all around us. Please supply evidence that this is true and also how this leads to your version of god being correct and the many thousands of other gods being incorrect.

“what religion would you like me to make a case against since you dont accept that mine has a savior.”

*more laughter* … the question is why do you dismiss other mumbo-jumbo religions yet accept yours as the “truth”. Why is your version of the “truth” any different for other religions version of the “truth”. You really have no answer to this do you?

“I really would like to convince you but I dont think you would accept anything short of God himself coming down and showing you how real he is.”

Nope, just even a scrap of evidence for your god and it’s your version of god we are talking about here isn’t it not just any old god. Of course if you just wish to admit that your whole basis for belief is based in blind faith, which it obviously is, then just come out and say it and stop the rather pathetic and arrogant hand waving that you have so far demonstrated. If you had evidence for you god you would have posted it. That fact that you haven’t tells me all I need to know.