<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adam&#8217;s First Wife</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/</link>
	<description>Reasonable Thoughts on Religion, Science, Skepticism, and Atheism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:20:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JROC</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-62500</link>
		<dc:creator>JROC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-62500</guid>
		<description>People come on, Adam an Eve..... Really now.  There&#039;s a much better read, It&#039;s called Brothers Grim fairy tales...     P.S. I&#039;d take Lilith anyday,  gotta love her...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People come on, Adam an Eve&#8230;.. Really now.  There&#8217;s a much better read, It&#8217;s called Brothers Grim fairy tales&#8230;     P.S. I&#8217;d take Lilith anyday,  gotta love her&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trj</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-58311</link>
		<dc:creator>trj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-58311</guid>
		<description>Well, it &lt;i&gt;could&lt;/i&gt; be that there&#039;s a very intricate and convoluted explanation, like this one, for the two differing genesis stories, which you have to coax from the Bible because it for some reason doesn&#039;t just explain such things to us straight out.

Or, it could be that, you know, it was actually just two different versions that were collected by one of the many editors of OT who didn&#039;t quite manage to make them match in the editing proces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it <i>could</i> be that there&#8217;s a very intricate and convoluted explanation, like this one, for the two differing genesis stories, which you have to coax from the Bible because it for some reason doesn&#8217;t just explain such things to us straight out.</p>
<p>Or, it could be that, you know, it was actually just two different versions that were collected by one of the many editors of OT who didn&#8217;t quite manage to make them match in the editing proces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Boatner</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-58297</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Boatner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-58297</guid>
		<description>I used to battle over why God created man twice when I was a kid. But if you read the scriptures. God is a spirit. john 4:24. when God said let us make man in our image, he was making man as a spirit. Jesus said a spirit has no flesh and bone. If you have no flesh and bone, you have no form. We all no a spirit really has no form. It says &quot;so God created man in his own image male and female created he them. So we no male and female was created as a spirit with no form. Then if you read on, it says God looked and saw there was not a man to tilll the ground. Why was there not a man to till the ground? Because man had no flesh and bone to be able to till the ground. Also when God created male and female it was on day six. after day six he rested on day seven. thats is when he looked on day seven and no man to till the ground. Then, remember, male and female is already created on day six. He watered the face of the earth and then formed man of the dust of the earth. male was created as a spirit, the formed as man from the earth. female was created, then he formed female also. go back and read about the beast, fowl, and creeping things, they were created and then formed also. Then brought to Adam to name them. Gen 2-3. read the scripture carefully and you will understand. I personally don&#039;t believe in this lilith person. There was a comment about sin before Eve. Sin didn&#039;t take place until after man and woman were formed. As long as we are in this fleshly shell, there will always be sin. The above is my church video site. Here is a link to a message called &quot;The Born Identity&quot; that will be helpful in what i just said. http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&amp;videoid=53914644. I hope this helps someone on this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to battle over why God created man twice when I was a kid. But if you read the scriptures. God is a spirit. john 4:24. when God said let us make man in our image, he was making man as a spirit. Jesus said a spirit has no flesh and bone. If you have no flesh and bone, you have no form. We all no a spirit really has no form. It says &#8220;so God created man in his own image male and female created he them. So we no male and female was created as a spirit with no form. Then if you read on, it says God looked and saw there was not a man to tilll the ground. Why was there not a man to till the ground? Because man had no flesh and bone to be able to till the ground. Also when God created male and female it was on day six. after day six he rested on day seven. thats is when he looked on day seven and no man to till the ground. Then, remember, male and female is already created on day six. He watered the face of the earth and then formed man of the dust of the earth. male was created as a spirit, the formed as man from the earth. female was created, then he formed female also. go back and read about the beast, fowl, and creeping things, they were created and then formed also. Then brought to Adam to name them. Gen 2-3. read the scripture carefully and you will understand. I personally don&#8217;t believe in this lilith person. There was a comment about sin before Eve. Sin didn&#8217;t take place until after man and woman were formed. As long as we are in this fleshly shell, there will always be sin. The above is my church video site. Here is a link to a message called &#8220;The Born Identity&#8221; that will be helpful in what i just said. <a href="http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&amp;videoid=53914644" rel="nofollow">http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&amp;videoid=53914644</a>. I hope this helps someone on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg rigby</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-53091</link>
		<dc:creator>greg rigby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-53091</guid>
		<description>Greg Rigby’s The God Secret uncovers a startling truth about the greatest mystery of all times—the origins of the Judeo/Christian God and its religious teachings. The proofs in the book will raise serious questions about the origins of the Western belief system
http://www.strategicbookpublishing.com/TheGodSecret.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Rigby’s The God Secret uncovers a startling truth about the greatest mystery of all times—the origins of the Judeo/Christian God and its religious teachings. The proofs in the book will raise serious questions about the origins of the Western belief system<br />
<a href="http://www.strategicbookpublishing.com/TheGodSecret.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.strategicbookpublishing.com/TheGodSecret.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Greene</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49786</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49786</guid>
		<description>I know this is off-subject, but I think the word &quot;nice&quot; has gotten a bad rap. To me, &quot;nice&quot; guys are guys who are reliable, have a backbone, keep their word, have integrity, and have the strength to commit when they see a good thing. It does NOT mean vanilla. I think too may guys equate &quot;nice&quot; with being weak, desperate or too eager to please. These are not attractive qualities. However, I would never consider dating anyone except a &quot;nice&quot; guy. And no self-respecting woman would. If whassisname who posted that mysogenistic crap is for real, he needs to get a character makeover before any real woman would consider even a first date. I&#039;m just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is off-subject, but I think the word &#8220;nice&#8221; has gotten a bad rap. To me, &#8220;nice&#8221; guys are guys who are reliable, have a backbone, keep their word, have integrity, and have the strength to commit when they see a good thing. It does NOT mean vanilla. I think too may guys equate &#8220;nice&#8221; with being weak, desperate or too eager to please. These are not attractive qualities. However, I would never consider dating anyone except a &#8220;nice&#8221; guy. And no self-respecting woman would. If whassisname who posted that mysogenistic crap is for real, he needs to get a character makeover before any real woman would consider even a first date. I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Greene</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49785</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49785</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure this is a joke. Nobody&#039;s that stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure this is a joke. Nobody&#8217;s that stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Greene</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49784</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49784</guid>
		<description>The real reason it&#039;s perplexing is because the editing in the bible was shoddy, and the council of necia in 325 AD forgot to remove some passages that would prove the bible was fundamentally flawed. They were in too much of a hurry. Too bad they didn&#039;t have &quot;search and replace&quot; on their computers back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real reason it&#8217;s perplexing is because the editing in the bible was shoddy, and the council of necia in 325 AD forgot to remove some passages that would prove the bible was fundamentally flawed. They were in too much of a hurry. Too bad they didn&#8217;t have &#8220;search and replace&#8221; on their computers back then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Greene</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49783</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49783</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if there were mailmen in that era. Maybe the tax man?  Or the census man, you know, the one from the jesus-being-born story?  He got around, lotsa lonely housewives whose husbands were being fishers of men and all that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if there were mailmen in that era. Maybe the tax man?  Or the census man, you know, the one from the jesus-being-born story?  He got around, lotsa lonely housewives whose husbands were being fishers of men and all that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Greene</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49782</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49782</guid>
		<description>These people make twice as much money as hookers. Too bad there were no customers for adam-eve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These people make twice as much money as hookers. Too bad there were no customers for adam-eve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Greene</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49781</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49781</guid>
		<description>John C, WHERE do you get your information???? I know I&#039;ve asked this before, never got an answer...is this part of the whole &quot;smooth down there&quot; discussion we had recently on another thread??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John C, WHERE do you get your information???? I know I&#8217;ve asked this before, never got an answer&#8230;is this part of the whole &#8220;smooth down there&#8221; discussion we had recently on another thread??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Greene</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49780</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49780</guid>
		<description>Clever!  6 degrees of separation. Reminds me of the sort of reasoning that linked Iraq to Al-Quada in the &quot;mind&quot; of George W (they both have &quot;Q&#039;s&quot; in their names! Let&#039;s go to war!!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clever!  6 degrees of separation. Reminds me of the sort of reasoning that linked Iraq to Al-Quada in the &#8220;mind&#8221; of George W (they both have &#8220;Q&#8217;s&#8221; in their names! Let&#8217;s go to war!!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49678</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49678</guid>
		<description>&quot;I could give you multiple references but we both know you wouldnt read them Bill.&quot;

What on earth would make you say that? You have never provided a reference for anything you have said here that I can recall, let alone in response to something I&#039;ve posted. What would make you think I wouldn&#039;t read them?

I&#039;m frankly sorprised you have provided one here. I will gladly take a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I could give you multiple references but we both know you wouldnt read them Bill.&#8221;</p>
<p>What on earth would make you say that? You have never provided a reference for anything you have said here that I can recall, let alone in response to something I&#8217;ve posted. What would make you think I wouldn&#8217;t read them?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m frankly sorprised you have provided one here. I will gladly take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aor</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49661</link>
		<dc:creator>Aor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49661</guid>
		<description>Does god have wisdom teeth, John?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does god have wisdom teeth, John?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brgulker</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49598</link>
		<dc:creator>brgulker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49598</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, Vorjack. Thanks for the time you put into. It&#039;s fascinating stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, Vorjack. Thanks for the time you put into. It&#8217;s fascinating stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brgulker</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/24/adams-first-wife/#comment-49595</link>
		<dc:creator>brgulker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5421#comment-49595</guid>
		<description>Not to tell you what to do here, but you might want to dig into how &#039;adonai&#039; fits into all that. It may enhance your piece a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to tell you what to do here, but you might want to dig into how &#8216;adonai&#8217; fits into all that. It may enhance your piece a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
