Comments on: Pat Robertson on the Feminist Agenda http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/ Reasonable Thoughts on Religion, Science, Skepticism, and Atheism Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:44:14 -0400 hourly 1 By: Fool for beautiful words http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-74014 Fool for beautiful words Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:48:14 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-74014 Everybody needs a scapegoat <i>and</i> an ideal enemy to hate, right? What a nice package he got himself. Moron. Everybody needs a scapegoat and an ideal enemy to hate, right? What a nice package he got himself. Moron.

]]> By: gmcfly http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73953 gmcfly Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:51:56 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73953 Well he could mean "their children" as in "their offspring." As in, "How many children do you have?" Well he could mean “their children” as in “their offspring.” As in, “How many children do you have?”

]]> By: gmcfly http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73951 gmcfly Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:45:42 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73951 He's likely talking about abortion. But he's still a nut. He’s likely talking about abortion. But he’s still a nut.

]]> By: The Nerd http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73849 The Nerd Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:36:30 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73849 Oh noes! He's onto us! Oh noes! He’s onto us!

]]> By: Cyberdraco http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73807 Cyberdraco Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:05:33 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73807 Ugh...Pat Dumbertson is in my back yard of all places...I try to avoid that intersection as much as possible...at least the 'real' xtians around here do not trust him either. Ugh…Pat Dumbertson is in my back yard of all places…I try to avoid that intersection as much as possible…at least the ‘real’ xtians around here do not trust him either.

]]> By: Mike http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73778 Mike Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:53:48 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73778 Anyone trying to decide just how cultural gender is should take a read of Brainsex by Anne Moir and David Jessel (ISBN 0-7493-0525-8). Anyone trying to decide just how cultural gender is should take a read of Brainsex by Anne Moir and David Jessel (ISBN 0-7493-0525-8).

]]> By: Jabster http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73773 Jabster Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:23:44 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73773 Groucho or the other ones that people can't remember? Groucho or the other ones that people can’t remember?

]]> By: Brian http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73765 Brian Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:55:52 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73765 He truly IS nuts, isn't he!? He truly IS nuts, isn’t he!?

]]> By: idea1013 http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73764 idea1013 Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:45:19 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73764 I'm not sure this was his intention, but I feel really empowered after reading that statement! lol I’m not sure this was his intention, but I feel really empowered after reading that statement! lol

]]> By: wazza http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73743 wazza Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:46:55 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73743 I'm pretty sure he doesn't provide stupid in such a concentrated form. Usually it's more spaced out, while this is nice and pithy. I’m pretty sure he doesn’t provide stupid in such a concentrated form. Usually it’s more spaced out, while this is nice and pithy.

]]> By: wazza http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73742 wazza Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:45:00 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73742 A lot of feminists were also socialists, and there is also a strain of admiration for lesbians in the more radical feminist movements, because men are bastards (which is a fair observation). And never forget the female separatist movement! A lot of feminists were also socialists, and there is also a strain of admiration for lesbians in the more radical feminist movements, because men are bastards (which is a fair observation).

And never forget the female separatist movement!

]]> By: wazza http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73740 wazza Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:42:00 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73740 no, he is Marx and Hitler's secret lovechild! no, he is Marx and Hitler’s secret lovechild!

]]> By: Michael http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73737 Michael Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:31:45 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73737 I would assume killing your children would be the biggest downside, although good arguments could be made both ways for destroying capitalism. Oh, and "anti-family" doesn't sound good, whatever it means, although I think killing children pretty much covers that. I would assume killing your children would be the biggest downside, although good arguments could be made both ways for destroying capitalism.

Oh, and “anti-family” doesn’t sound good, whatever it means, although I think killing children pretty much covers that.

]]> By: trj http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73736 trj Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:24:53 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73736 No, Obama is the reincarnation of Marx. No, Obama is the reincarnation of Marx.

]]> By: Laura http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/02/pat-robertson-on-the-feminist-agenda/#comment-73727 Laura Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:36:56 +0000 http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8300#comment-73727 And of course, no longer be submissive to men! Which is the real issue, I believe. . . And of course, no longer be submissive to men! Which is the real issue, I believe. . .

]]>