<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflections on a Winter&#8217;s Night</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/</link>
	<description>Reasonable Thoughts on Religion, Science, Skepticism, and Atheism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:43:04 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Favorite Posts of 2009 &#124; Unreasonable Faith</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-77830</link>
		<dc:creator>Favorite Posts of 2009 &#124; Unreasonable Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-77830</guid>
		<description>[...] Reflections on a Winter’s Night [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reflections on a Winter’s Night [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claidheamh mor</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75567</link>
		<dc:creator>claidheamh mor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75567</guid>
		<description>Yeah! Maybe someone who lived before was a mushroom-like silicon-based life form, not &quot;Cleopatra&quot; like my woo-woo friend thought that (of course, could you see it coming?) she was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah! Maybe someone who lived before was a mushroom-like silicon-based life form, not &#8220;Cleopatra&#8221; like my woo-woo friend thought that (of course, could you see it coming?) she was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claidheamh mor</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75565</link>
		<dc:creator>claidheamh mor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75565</guid>
		<description>Yep, another way of saying it well.

Biblical subsistence shepherds maybe were just simple; now to believe that stuff, you have to be a simpleton. 

I&#039;ve long associated christianity and illiteracy (with the exception of some authors and thinkers); but I think innumeracy, which is just another symptom or expression of some kind of lack of ability to comprehend or simple-mindedness, is even more closely associated with it.

Hmmm... lack of ability to comprehend... concepts like:
anthropology; cultural diversity; sexual diversity, family structure over the world and over history; environmentalism (specifically, overpopulation); the scale you and others have noted from the atomic sub-micro to the universal macro; all of the factors involved in an ethical decision and action; the rigidity and irrelevance of absolute rules that substitute for conscience, empathy, and the ability to reason and be ethical; the irrelevance of 6,000 year old mythologies and 2,000 year old fables.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, another way of saying it well.</p>
<p>Biblical subsistence shepherds maybe were just simple; now to believe that stuff, you have to be a simpleton. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve long associated christianity and illiteracy (with the exception of some authors and thinkers); but I think innumeracy, which is just another symptom or expression of some kind of lack of ability to comprehend or simple-mindedness, is even more closely associated with it.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; lack of ability to comprehend&#8230; concepts like:<br />
anthropology; cultural diversity; sexual diversity, family structure over the world and over history; environmentalism (specifically, overpopulation); the scale you and others have noted from the atomic sub-micro to the universal macro; all of the factors involved in an ethical decision and action; the rigidity and irrelevance of absolute rules that substitute for conscience, empathy, and the ability to reason and be ethical; the irrelevance of 6,000 year old mythologies and 2,000 year old fables&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elemenope</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75562</link>
		<dc:creator>Elemenope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75562</guid>
		<description>Maybe God is local. It&#039;s pretty much the only way to salvage the personal aspect of deity in light of the enormity of the universe, not that many religious people would accede to the possibility...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe God is local. It&#8217;s pretty much the only way to salvage the personal aspect of deity in light of the enormity of the universe, not that many religious people would accede to the possibility&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claidheamh mor</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75558</link>
		<dc:creator>claidheamh mor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75558</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it made some sense for the original God Vorjack mentioned to be a micromanager of human lives: if he walked in their camps like a local monarch, then the bible verse ordering the people to bury their poop so he wouldn&#039;t step in it made some sense. Kibitzing in people&#039;s mating habits at least would be in character; he would want to control his people, and maybe have some of the unsullied maidens for himself.

But people now, who have astronomy in their faces, who know about superclusters of galaxies, and the earth not being the center of God&#039;s special little heaven designed just for earth people to look at, who &lt;i&gt; still&lt;/i&gt; think there is some certifiably neurotic God who gives a damn how people mate, whether they get a government license to mate, whether they read a cobbled-together book of Hebrew and Greek fiction, whether they go inside a building on their day off and chant and sing, whether the females have all the sex they want without being &quot;punished&quot; by a forced pregnancy, and whether they carry through a pregnancy to overpopulate the world still further, are abominably, execrably, egregiously stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it made some sense for the original God Vorjack mentioned to be a micromanager of human lives: if he walked in their camps like a local monarch, then the bible verse ordering the people to bury their poop so he wouldn&#8217;t step in it made some sense. Kibitzing in people&#8217;s mating habits at least would be in character; he would want to control his people, and maybe have some of the unsullied maidens for himself.</p>
<p>But people now, who have astronomy in their faces, who know about superclusters of galaxies, and the earth not being the center of God&#8217;s special little heaven designed just for earth people to look at, who <i> still</i> think there is some certifiably neurotic God who gives a damn how people mate, whether they get a government license to mate, whether they read a cobbled-together book of Hebrew and Greek fiction, whether they go inside a building on their day off and chant and sing, whether the females have all the sex they want without being &#8220;punished&#8221; by a forced pregnancy, and whether they carry through a pregnancy to overpopulate the world still further, are abominably, execrably, egregiously stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siberia</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75535</link>
		<dc:creator>Siberia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75535</guid>
		<description>True, which is why I wrote &quot;sounds&quot;, not &quot;would be&quot;. Even if it&#039;s utterly unsuitable - and it would be - doesn&#039;t mean I wouldn&#039;t perceive it as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, which is why I wrote &#8220;sounds&#8221;, not &#8220;would be&#8221;. Even if it&#8217;s utterly unsuitable &#8211; and it would be &#8211; doesn&#8217;t mean I wouldn&#8217;t perceive it as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jabster</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jabster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75533</guid>
		<description>&quot;A deity like this sounds so incredibly petty.&quot;

I doubt if there where such an entity that words we used to describe are own attributes would in anyway be suitable to describe its attributes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A deity like this sounds so incredibly petty.&#8221;</p>
<p>I doubt if there where such an entity that words we used to describe are own attributes would in anyway be suitable to describe its attributes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siberia</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75532</link>
		<dc:creator>Siberia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75532</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But yeah, Vorjack had it right the first time and I apply the label: something that created galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and superclusters being interested in our mating habits isn’t stupid. It’s beyond stupid.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
This.

A deity like this sounds so incredibly petty. Like the supreme deity of all universe is obsessive-compulsive about everything being &lt;i&gt;just so&lt;/i&gt;. Everything has to be spotless, everything has to work like a clockwork and don&#039;t you &lt;i&gt;dare&lt;/i&gt; step one milimeter out of the line, or s/he/it will throw a divine tantrum of universal proportions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But yeah, Vorjack had it right the first time and I apply the label: something that created galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and superclusters being interested in our mating habits isn’t stupid. It’s beyond stupid.</p></blockquote>
<p>This.</p>
<p>A deity like this sounds so incredibly petty. Like the supreme deity of all universe is obsessive-compulsive about everything being <i>just so</i>. Everything has to be spotless, everything has to work like a clockwork and don&#8217;t you <i>dare</i> step one milimeter out of the line, or s/he/it will throw a divine tantrum of universal proportions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claidheamh mor</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75523</link>
		<dc:creator>claidheamh mor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75523</guid>
		<description>Yeah, maybe the the bible-time-subsistence farmers weren&#039;t stupid for their time. Maybe simpletons. But yeah, Vorjack had it right the first time and I apply the label: something that created galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and superclusters being interested in our mating habits isn&#039;t stupid. It&#039;s beyond stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, maybe the the bible-time-subsistence farmers weren&#8217;t stupid for their time. Maybe simpletons. But yeah, Vorjack had it right the first time and I apply the label: something that created galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and superclusters being interested in our mating habits isn&#8217;t stupid. It&#8217;s beyond stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claidheamh mor</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75522</link>
		<dc:creator>claidheamh mor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75522</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;some call the attempt to completely understand God hubris (i think so too)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hubris to attempt to understand an imaginary created thing with all of humankind&#039;s faults.

A cartoon invented in cobbled-together and re-invented bits of writing by Bronze Age shepherds, or maybe by people intending to control the shepherds. (Or people who seemed to love sheep, probably in every imaginable way.)

That&#039;s funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>some call the attempt to completely understand God hubris (i think so too)</p></blockquote>
<p>Hubris to attempt to understand an imaginary created thing with all of humankind&#8217;s faults.</p>
<p>A cartoon invented in cobbled-together and re-invented bits of writing by Bronze Age shepherds, or maybe by people intending to control the shepherds. (Or people who seemed to love sheep, probably in every imaginable way.)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75509</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75509</guid>
		<description>Wooo life complexity rivals the universes?
Boy you will be big surprised to see how complex even the sun is.
Stars so things that even life on Earth cannot do, that is creating new elements like hydrogen, Oxygen, Iron,,..... What life does is peanuts to what the universe does.

Scientists have far better understanding of life than of the sun since it is more complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wooo life complexity rivals the universes?<br />
Boy you will be big surprised to see how complex even the sun is.<br />
Stars so things that even life on Earth cannot do, that is creating new elements like hydrogen, Oxygen, Iron,,&#8230;.. What life does is peanuts to what the universe does.</p>
<p>Scientists have far better understanding of life than of the sun since it is more complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75505</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 00:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75505</guid>
		<description>The universe is probably full of life everywhere. But so far we don&#039;t know yet what to look for. There are 500.000 galaxies in an area of 5 times the moon. To understand the scale imagine that the solar system would be an atom in a our oceans.
For example Mars have very strong evidences that it can support life a long time ago and also moons like Europa could support life. There is even water on the hottest planet Mercury!

There is also this Mars meteorite that suggests fossil life, from Mars.
There might not be a advanced civilization on Mars, but the fact tat life is discovered tjere means that other planets will probably also have it.

Astronomy is at the verge of detecting Earth sized planets in the next 3 years. There is a 3 year project ongoing right now. 

Also scientists can actually now program a computer that creates this programmed DNA sequence and from this create life from scratch that never existed or evolved before. Still basic stuff. Just check out the BBC documentary &quot;The Cell&quot; 

One thing I do know, out there in the universe, there are planets that are far better placed than Earth, have real paradises and probably has evolved life forms that are way superior and complex than life on Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The universe is probably full of life everywhere. But so far we don&#8217;t know yet what to look for. There are 500.000 galaxies in an area of 5 times the moon. To understand the scale imagine that the solar system would be an atom in a our oceans.<br />
For example Mars have very strong evidences that it can support life a long time ago and also moons like Europa could support life. There is even water on the hottest planet Mercury!</p>
<p>There is also this Mars meteorite that suggests fossil life, from Mars.<br />
There might not be a advanced civilization on Mars, but the fact tat life is discovered tjere means that other planets will probably also have it.</p>
<p>Astronomy is at the verge of detecting Earth sized planets in the next 3 years. There is a 3 year project ongoing right now. </p>
<p>Also scientists can actually now program a computer that creates this programmed DNA sequence and from this create life from scratch that never existed or evolved before. Still basic stuff. Just check out the BBC documentary &#8220;The Cell&#8221; </p>
<p>One thing I do know, out there in the universe, there are planets that are far better placed than Earth, have real paradises and probably has evolved life forms that are way superior and complex than life on Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75414</link>
		<dc:creator>John C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75414</guid>
		<description>D&#039;n...ok, I&#039;ll try man. First, there is nothing especially &quot;rational&quot; about Love my friend, It does not fall within those (man made) confines, is &quot;above&quot; that plane or level. We see &quot;evidence&quot; for Him in those He indwells, in whom He is the very Substance of their lives and so they manifest His Life and nature which is most unlike typical humanity in that they are not self-concerned, are (always) others-focused, sacrificial, humble, tender hearted, gentle, grounded in love. These are not merely &quot;nice&quot; people but other-worldly kinda folks who are few and far between and who live &quot;from&quot; the Life of Another having forsaken their own. They are InChristed followers in whom God has literally established His very kingdom and presence. He rules and reigns within them in peace &amp; righteousness.

JC said the kingdom of God was within us, was not an external (viewable with our natural eyes) kind of kingdom. Mankind is the intended image and dwelling place of God. When they asked JC to &quot;show them the Father&quot; His response was this &quot;when you&#039;ve seen me you&#039;ve seen the Father&quot; and that &quot;He and the Father are One&quot;. He is the Template, the Pattern Son and looked a lot like original, pre-death (sin, separation) mankind who was (originally) created in His very image &amp; likeness, is His &quot;temple&quot; or intended dwelling place. 

While the heavens (the galaxies, sun, moon, stars, etc) &quot;declare His handiwork&quot; as (OT) scripture declares, the truth of the (NT) is revealed in God-indwelt mankind, ie Christ. Paul said it this way &quot;I have been crucified with Christ, its no longer I that lives, but now Christ is living his life thru me&quot;. 

So looking &quot;out there&quot; will eventually lead us to the truth inwardly, that has been my experience these many years. All the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;n&#8230;ok, I&#8217;ll try man. First, there is nothing especially &#8220;rational&#8221; about Love my friend, It does not fall within those (man made) confines, is &#8220;above&#8221; that plane or level. We see &#8220;evidence&#8221; for Him in those He indwells, in whom He is the very Substance of their lives and so they manifest His Life and nature which is most unlike typical humanity in that they are not self-concerned, are (always) others-focused, sacrificial, humble, tender hearted, gentle, grounded in love. These are not merely &#8220;nice&#8221; people but other-worldly kinda folks who are few and far between and who live &#8220;from&#8221; the Life of Another having forsaken their own. They are InChristed followers in whom God has literally established His very kingdom and presence. He rules and reigns within them in peace &amp; righteousness.</p>
<p>JC said the kingdom of God was within us, was not an external (viewable with our natural eyes) kind of kingdom. Mankind is the intended image and dwelling place of God. When they asked JC to &#8220;show them the Father&#8221; His response was this &#8220;when you&#8217;ve seen me you&#8217;ve seen the Father&#8221; and that &#8220;He and the Father are One&#8221;. He is the Template, the Pattern Son and looked a lot like original, pre-death (sin, separation) mankind who was (originally) created in His very image &amp; likeness, is His &#8220;temple&#8221; or intended dwelling place. </p>
<p>While the heavens (the galaxies, sun, moon, stars, etc) &#8220;declare His handiwork&#8221; as (OT) scripture declares, the truth of the (NT) is revealed in God-indwelt mankind, ie Christ. Paul said it this way &#8220;I have been crucified with Christ, its no longer I that lives, but now Christ is living his life thru me&#8221;. </p>
<p>So looking &#8220;out there&#8221; will eventually lead us to the truth inwardly, that has been my experience these many years. All the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'n</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75400</link>
		<dc:creator>D'n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75400</guid>
		<description>So how does saying &quot;yes he does care about us&quot; show that there is actually an anthropomorphic god that is especially interested in humanity?  Isn&#039;t it simply more rational to believe that it is simply projection on the universe, as I&#039;m sure you would claim all other religions are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how does saying &#8220;yes he does care about us&#8221; show that there is actually an anthropomorphic god that is especially interested in humanity?  Isn&#8217;t it simply more rational to believe that it is simply projection on the universe, as I&#8217;m sure you would claim all other religions are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig A. James</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/11/reflections-on-a-winters-night/#comment-75308</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig A. James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8569#comment-75308</guid>
		<description>Your article on the vastness of the universe is similar to one I wrote about innumeracy in general - the inability of humans to grasp the true scale of things. It&#039;s one of the fundamental reasons creationists thrive.  People have a really hard time grasping just how enormously long 4 billion years is.  You can &lt;a href=&quot;http://religionvirus.blogspot.com/2009/09/evolutions-big-mystery-in-beginning_08.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;read about it here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article on the vastness of the universe is similar to one I wrote about innumeracy in general &#8211; the inability of humans to grasp the true scale of things. It&#8217;s one of the fundamental reasons creationists thrive.  People have a really hard time grasping just how enormously long 4 billion years is.  You can <a href="http://religionvirus.blogspot.com/2009/09/evolutions-big-mystery-in-beginning_08.html" rel="nofollow">read about it here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
