<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unreasonable Faith &#187; Pseudoscience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unreasonablefaith.com/category/pseudoscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com</link>
	<description>Reasonable Thoughts on Religion, Science, Skepticism, and Atheism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Surprise — Alternative Medicine Doesn&#8217;t Work!</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/15/surprise-%e2%80%94-alternative-medicine-doesnt-work/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/15/surprise-%e2%80%94-alternative-medicine-doesnt-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=5403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know this will be a shocker to many of you, but a recent government study has concluded that most alternative medicine doesn&#8217;t work:
Ten years ago the government set out to test herbal and other alternative health remedies to find the ones that work. After spending $2.5 billion, the disappointing answer seems to be that almost none [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2287" title="Psychic" src="http://unreasonablefaith.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/psychic.png" alt="Psychic" width="194" height="142" align="right" />I know this will be a shocker to many of you, but a recent government study has concluded that <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31190909/">most alternative medicine doesn&#8217;t work</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ten years ago the government set out to test herbal and other alternative health remedies to find the ones that work. After spending $2.5 billion, the disappointing answer seems to be that almost none of them do.</p>
<p>Echinacea for colds. Ginkgo biloba for memory. Glucosamine and chondroitin for arthritis. Black cohosh for menopausal hot flashes. Saw palmetto for prostate problems. Shark cartilage for cancer. All proved no better than dummy pills in big studies funded by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. The lone exception: ginger capsules may help chemotherapy nausea.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh well, I guess we&#8217;ll have to rely on <em>prayer</em> instead, right?</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.cynical-c.com/?p=13521">via</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/15/surprise-%e2%80%94-alternative-medicine-doesnt-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-Scientific vs Scientific Thinking</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/12/non-scientific-vs-scientific-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/12/non-scientific-vs-scientific-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=2189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whereas non-scientific (and potentially dangerous) thinking starts with a premise and then looks for things that support it, scientific thinking constantly tries to disprove itself. That alone makes all the difference in the world.
—Derren Brown, Tricks of the Mind, p. 266
If we start with a premise and only look for things that support it, we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Whereas non-scientific (and potentially dangerous) thinking starts with a premise and then looks for things that support it, scientific thinking constantly tries to <em>disprove</em> itself. That alone makes all the difference in the world.</p>
<p>—Derren Brown, <a href="http://amazon.com/o/ASIN/1905026358/unreasonablefaith-20/ref=nosim/"><em>Tricks of the Mind</em></a>, p. 266</p></blockquote>
<p>If we start with a premise and only look for things that support it, we will find something, and we will be confirmed in our belief. But science — at least <em>good</em> science — looks not only for things that support it, but for things that disprove it. That is why studies and tests are done, instead of citing an ancient &#8220;authority&#8221; and/or appealing to emotions.</p>
<p>If everyone tried to disprove their own beliefs, we would be much closer to the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/12/non-scientific-vs-scientific-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Efficacy of Prayer Positions</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/10/efficacy-of-prayer-positions/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/10/efficacy-of-prayer-positions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paranormal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superstition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=4554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in case you were wondering, you can immensely improve the quantity of positive energy accessible and decrease interference by negative energies simply by changing your prayer position! Praise Mother Earth!

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case you were wondering, <a href="http://www.spiritualresearchfoundation.org/articles/id/aboutspiritualresearch/SpiritualPractice/prayer/howprayerworks#s55">you can immensely improve</a> the quantity of positive energy accessible <em>and</em> decrease interference by negative energies simply by changing your prayer position! Praise Mother Earth!</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4555" title="prayer-efficacy" src="http://unreasonablefaith.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/prayer-efficacy.jpg" alt="prayer-efficacy" width="400" height="473" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/06/10/efficacy-of-prayer-positions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Randi Speaks at NASA</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/05/12/james-randi-speaks-at-nasa/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/05/12/james-randi-speaks-at-nasa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superstition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=4343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sound on this is horrible, but the content is good. James Randi talks about woo, the million dollar challenge, and homeopathy.

See the rest of the lecture
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sound on this is horrible, but the content is good. James Randi talks about woo, the million dollar challenge, and homeopathy.</p>
<p><!-- Smart Youtube --><span class="youtube"><object width="590" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HP_JI-qJ1Uk&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HP_JI-qJ1Uk&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="590" height="355" ></embed><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=07A38150C7FC8CCB">See the rest of the lecture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/05/12/james-randi-speaks-at-nasa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Praying With Spiritual Emotion</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/05/12/praying-with-spiritual-emotion/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/05/12/praying-with-spiritual-emotion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oh the Stupidity!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paranormal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=4547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These guys have it all figured out, don&#8217;t they? And no, they&#8217;re not joking:
I disagree strongly with this. Through my rigorous testing and analysis, I measured 43.5% accessibility of Divine Consciousness frequencies, and 12.97% of Divine Consciousness frequencies transmitted outside the body.
I dare them to show evidence against my claims!
(via)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.spiritualresearchfoundation.org/articles/id/aboutspiritualresearch/SpiritualPractice/prayer/howprayerworks">These guys</a> have it all figured out, don&#8217;t they? And no, they&#8217;re not joking:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4548" title="praying-with-spirtual-emotion" src="http://unreasonablefaith.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/praying-with-spirtual-emotion.jpg" alt="praying-with-spirtual-emotion" width="400" height="513" />I disagree strongly with this. Through my rigorous testing and analysis, I measured 43.5% accessibility of Divine Consciousness frequencies, and 12.97% of Divine Consciousness frequencies transmitted outside the body.</p>
<p>I dare them to show evidence against my claims!</p>
<p>(<a href="http://zeekeekee.wordpress.com/">via</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/05/12/praying-with-spiritual-emotion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, the Dead Can&#8217;t Communicate</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/05/03/no-the-dead-cant-communicate/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/05/03/no-the-dead-cant-communicate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 09:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superstition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=4236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SoulPancake, a site created by Rainn Wilson, asks &#8220;life&#8217;s big questions&#8221; with a forum for people to respond. A question I recently saw was &#8220;Can the dead communicate with the living?&#8221;
We&#8217;re in the 21st century now, and we&#8217;re still asking that question? Sheesh. But get a load of these answers from people:
Definitely. After my Dad died, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2287" title="Psychic" src="http://unreasonablefaith.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/psychic.png" alt="Psychic" width="194" height="142" align="right" /><a href="http://www.soulpancake.com/">SoulPancake</a>, a site created by Rainn Wilson, asks &#8220;life&#8217;s big questions&#8221; with a forum for people to respond. A question I recently saw was &#8220;<a href="http://www.soulpancake.com/view_post/262631/can-the-dead-communicate-with-the-living.html">Can the dead communicate with the living?</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re in the 21st century now, and we&#8217;re still asking that question? Sheesh. But get a load of these answers from people:</p>
<blockquote><p>Definitely. After my Dad died, at least two or three times, I smelled his presence really strongly at least four times on four different occasions.</p>
<p>OH YES!!!!! too many freaky things have happened to me personally for me to think otherwise</p>
<p>In my opinion, of couse they can. The follow you around until you tell them to leave. And even then, if their &#8220;mission&#8221; isn&#8217;t completed, they shift themselves into different things, like an animal, or a bird you see often. If ghosts scare you, they will present themselves in a different way. Have you ever thought of someone out of the blue? That is their way of saying hello.</p>
<p>I believe the dead do communicate with us in different ways, but I think that you have to be open to the &#8220;communication&#8221; in order to recognize what is happening.</p>
<p>Yes. My mother swears that she saw my dead Nana (my mom&#8217;s mom) sitting in a chair in her room for months. Finally she told Nana that she forgave her for the horrible way she treated my mothers during her youth. The next night she was gone.</p></blockquote>
<p>Humans want immortality. So we deceive ourselves into believing in ghosts and ghouls and gods. It gives us hope there is more.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s probably not more. There has never been <em>any</em> evidence a dead person can communicate with a living person. Countless numbers of psyhics and mediums have been shown to be frauds. None have been shown to be legitimate. Yet we still believe, because we want it to be true.</p>
<p>We fool ourselves far too easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/05/03/no-the-dead-cant-communicate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Open Your Mind Too Much&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/20/if-you-open-your-mind-too-much/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/20/if-you-open-your-mind-too-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=3721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Minchin on the danger of opening your mind too much:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Minchin on the danger of opening your mind too much:</p>
<p><!-- Smart Youtube --><span class="youtube"><object width="590" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RFO6ZhUW38w&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RFO6ZhUW38w&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="590" height="355" ></embed><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/20/if-you-open-your-mind-too-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>246</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storm by Tim Minchin</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/14/storm-by-tim-minchin/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/14/storm-by-tim-minchin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superstition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=3719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really, really, really good. Seriously — I can&#8217;t tell you how awesome I think this video is. It&#8217;s 9 minutes, but it&#8217;s worth your time.
I&#8217;ve been in similar in situations, and I can&#8217;t keep my mouth shut for long, either.

Finally, poetry I can appreciate!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really, really, <em>really</em> good. Seriously — I can&#8217;t tell you how awesome I think this video is. It&#8217;s 9 minutes, but it&#8217;s worth your time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been in similar in situations, and I can&#8217;t keep my mouth shut for long, either.</p>
<p><!-- Smart Youtube --><span class="youtube"><object width="590" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UB_htqDCP-s&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UB_htqDCP-s&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="590" height="355" ></embed><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object></span></p>
<p>Finally, poetry I can appreciate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/14/storm-by-tim-minchin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improving Your Psychic Abilities</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/09/improving-your-psychic-abilities/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/09/improving-your-psychic-abilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superstition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=3590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This could be helpful, if it wasn&#8217;t complete bullshit.

(via)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be helpful, if it wasn&#8217;t <em>complete bullshit</em>.</p>
<p><!-- Smart Youtube --><span class="youtube"><object width="590" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bzbC6Ox-N6A&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bzbC6Ox-N6A&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="590" height="355" ></embed><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object></span></p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.cynical-c.com/?p=13104">via</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/09/improving-your-psychic-abilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Things You Need to Know About Chiropractic Therapy</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/06/7-things-you-need-to-know-about-chiropractic-therapy/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/06/7-things-you-need-to-know-about-chiropractic-therapy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=3319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) It was founded by a quack.
Daniel David Palmer discovered the power of spinal manipulation by allegedly healing a deaf man by repositioning a vertebrae in his spine. Shortly after, he healed someone with heart trouble through the same technique. Convinced he discovered a new medical technique, he opened the Palmer School of Chiropractic in 1897.
Palmer claimed that 95% of all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="right size-full wp-image-3505" title="xray" src="http://unreasonablefaith.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/xray.jpg" alt="xray" width="190" height="238" align="right" /><strong>1) It was founded by a quack.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_David_Palmer">Daniel David Palmer</a> discovered the power of spinal manipulation by allegedly healing a deaf man by repositioning a vertebrae in his spine. Shortly after, he healed someone with heart trouble through the same technique. Convinced he discovered a new medical technique, he opened the Palmer School of Chiropractic in 1897.</p>
<p>Palmer claimed that 95% of all diseases were caused by displaced vertebrae, a belief many chiropractors today still hold. To explain this, he invented new terms like &#8220;subluxation&#8221; (a displacement of the spine), which resulted in a blockage of the body&#8217;s &#8220;innate intelligence.&#8221; Whatever that means.</p>
<p>He refused to acknowledge the role of germs in sickness and was taken to court numerous times. His &#8220;persecution&#8221; put fuel on the fire of his new religion, where he compared himself to Jesus, Mohammed, Joseph Smith, and Martin Luther.</p>
<p><strong>2) It was spread by the quack&#8217;s son, a fraud.</strong></p>
<p>In 1913, Daniel Palmer was ran over in a parade by his son, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._J._Palmer">Bartlett Palmer</a>. He died a few weeks later. Some believe it was no accident, as the father and son were quarreling over chiropractic treatments. Bartlett was an entrepreneur and invented the &#8220;neurocalometer,&#8221; which he claimed detected subluxations. He sold them to 2,000 gullible graduates from his college <em>for the price of a house</em>.</p>
<p>His customers ended up dissatisfied with his product, so he was sued. It ended up all the device contained was a thermocouple — that is, an electric thermometer.</p>
<p>With his new riches, he created one of America&#8217;s first radio stations in 1922. In between news and general programming, the station carried lectures by Palmer, helping the chiropractic movement gain unwarranted credibility and popularity.</p>
<p><strong>3) There are two kinds of chiropractors: <em>straight</em> and <em>mixers</em>.</strong></p>
<p>Think of straights as fundamentalists and mixers as liberals. Straights strictly adhere to Palmer&#8217;s original teachings about subluxations and innate intelligence. They are skeptical about germ theory and vaccinations and believe chiropractic therapy can heal 95% of diseases. They are, in other words, quacks. We can only be thankful Palmer didn&#8217;t prescribe blood letting, lest these zealots try and continue the practice today.</p>
<p>Mixers do away with the original dogma and only claim to help with back and neck problems. If you need to go to a chiropractor because conventional medicine isn&#8217;t working for you, be sure to go to a mixer.</p>
<p><strong>4) Chiropractic neck manipulations can cause strokes.</strong></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let a chiropractor snap your neck. There are two arteries that are threaded through the neck vertebrae, causing them to kink. This is usually fine, except when the neck is stretched and suddenly turned — exactly what chiropractors do. It can tear the lining of the artery, which can form a blot clot.</p>
<p>This has caused strokes for patients. For instance, it happened to <a href="http://quackfiles.blogspot.com/2008/10/beware-spinal-trap-simon-singh.html">Laurie Mathiason</a> in 1997, as well as several other documented cases.</p>
<p><strong>5) Chiropractic therapy is no more effective than therapeutic exercise, and is more expensive and risky.</strong></p>
<p>Back problems are difficult to live with and difficult to treat. Conventional medicine has struggled to produce very effective treatments for back problems, so it is tempting to try alternative treatments — especially chiropractic therapy. But studies have not shown that chiropractic therapy is any more effective than conventional medicine. Worse, it is usually more expensive and risky.</p>
<p>After reviewing the studies done on chiropractic therapy compared with conventional medicine, the authors of <em><a href="http://amazon.com/o/ASIN/0393066614/unreasonablefaith-20/ref=nosim/">Trick or Treatment?</a></em> had this to say:</p>
<blockquote><p>In terms of dealing with the underlying problem, doctors might recommend physiotherapy or exercise. And in terms of dealing with symptoms, doctors often prescribe non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NASIDs), such as ibuprofen. These approaches are, however, only mildly or marginally effective. A truly life-changing cure for back pain has not been found.</p>
<p>When the two approaches are compared against each other, spinal manipulation versus conventional medicine, the result is that each is just about as effective (or non-effective) as the other&#8230;. Spinal manipulation might help those who suffer with back pain, but conventional approaches offer similarly marginal levels of benefit&#8230;.</p>
<p>Because physiotherapeutic exercise is a much safer treatment than chiropractic manipulation, we would strongly recommend the former rather than the latter as the first choice.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>6) A &#8220;Doctor of Chiropractic&#8221; (DC) does not mean they are a medical doctor.</strong></p>
<p>Most chiropractors put &#8220;Dr.&#8221; before their name. This might fool you into thinking they&#8217;re a medical doctor — but they&#8217;re not. A DC means the practitioner completed a 4 year chiropractic course.</p>
<p>That might make them an expert in cracking backs and snapping necks, but it does not make them a medical doctor, and they should not serve as a primary healthcare provider. They did <em>not</em> attend medical school, unless they have more than a MD as well as a DC, which is rare.</p>
<p><strong>7) Chiropractors have a high fraud and sexual transgression rate.</strong></p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0161475404001319">California survey in 2004</a>, compared to medical doctors, chiropractors are:</p>
<ul>
<li>2x more likely to be involved in malpractice</li>
<li>9x more likely to be practicing fraud</li>
<li>2x more likely to transgress sexual boundaries</li>
</ul>
<p>Be sure to check the reputation of a chiropractor if you are going to see one.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>[digg=http://digg.com/health/7_Things_You_Need_to_Know_About_Chiropractic_Therapy]Chiropractic therapy can legitimately help some back problems. But instead of being the first option, it should probably be the last. The science of it is shaky, the risks are real, and even for back problems, it has not been shown to be more effective than conventional treatments like therapeutic exercise or pain relievers.</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p><strong>Further Resources</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Barrett, Stephen M.D. &#8220;<a href="http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/chirostroke.html">Chiropractic&#8217;s Dirty Secret: Neck Manipulation and Strokes</a>&#8220;</li>
<li>Ernst, E. &#8220;<a href="http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/full/100/7/330">Adverse effects of spinal manipulation: a systematic review</a>&#8221; (<em>Royal Society of Medicine</em>, 2007)</li>
<li>Keating, JC. &#8220;Chiropractic: science and antiscience and pseudoscience side by side&#8221; (<em>Skeptical Inquirer</em>, July 1st, 1997)</li>
<li>Nelson, Craig. &#8220;<a href="http://www.acsh.org/healthissues/newsID.656/healthissue_detail.asp">Spinal Manipulation and Chiropractic: Views of a Reformist Chiropractor</a>&#8221; (American Council on Science and Health, 1999)</li>
<li>Singh &amp; Ernst. <em><a href="http://amazon.com/o/ASIN/0393066614/unreasonablefaith-20/ref=nosim/">Trick or Treatment</a></em> (2008)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.chirobase.org/">Chirobase</a> &#8211; A Skeptical Guide to Chiropractic History, Theories, and Current Practices</li>
<li><a href="http://www.neck911usa.com/">Neck911USA</a> &#8211; A volunteer group who provide consultations on complications due to neck manipulation</li>
<li><a href="http://www.geocities.com/healthbase/mencken_chiro.html">H.L. Mencken on Chiropractic</a></li>
<li>See more links at <a href="http://www.geocities.com/healthbase/chirolinks.html">ChiroLinks</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/06/7-things-you-need-to-know-about-chiropractic-therapy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open-Mindedness</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/04/open-mindedness/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/04/open-mindedness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=3476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many pseudoscience advocates claim people who reject pseudoscience are not &#8220;open-minded.&#8221; Yet science promotes and thrives on open-mindedness. Here&#8217;s a video that conveys this concept well:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many pseudoscience advocates claim people who reject pseudoscience are not &#8220;open-minded.&#8221; Yet science promotes and thrives on open-mindedness. Here&#8217;s a video that conveys this concept well:</p>
<p><!-- Smart Youtube --><span class="youtube"><object width="590" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T69TOuqaqXI&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/T69TOuqaqXI&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="590" height="355" ></embed><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/04/04/open-mindedness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penn and Teller: Placebo Effect</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/03/21/penn-and-teller-placebo-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/03/21/penn-and-teller-placebo-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superstition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=3210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is hilarious and yet sad. If you must skip, skip to 4:30 where people willingly put snails on their faces in order to remove wrinkles. It&#8217;s unbelievable.

Is there anything people won&#8217;t do just because someone in a white coat tells them to do it?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hilarious and yet sad. If you must skip, skip to 4:30 where people willingly put snails on their faces in order to remove wrinkles. It&#8217;s unbelievable.</p>
<p><!-- Smart Youtube --><span class="youtube"><object width="590" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MzjoKhBklYg&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MzjoKhBklYg&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="590" height="355" ></embed><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object></span></p>
<p>Is there anything people <em>won&#8217;t</em> do just because someone in a white coat tells them to do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/03/21/penn-and-teller-placebo-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Institute for Real God</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/02/03/the-institute-for-the-real-god/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/02/03/the-institute-for-the-real-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paranormal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=1854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re looking for a new, cool organization to join, check out The Institute for Real God. Their goal is to be &#8220;an educational organization devoted to making genuine spirituality and spiritual practice accessible to as many people as possible.&#8221; Of course &#8220;genuine spiritually&#8221; is whatever they think it means.
Oh, and be sure to check out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re looking for a new, cool organization to join, check out <a href="http://www.realgod.org/index.html">The Institute for Real God</a>. Their goal is to be &#8220;an educational organization devoted to making genuine spirituality and spiritual practice accessible to as many people as possible.&#8221; Of course &#8220;genuine spiritually&#8221; is whatever they think it means.</p>
<p>Oh, and be sure to check out &#8220;<a href="http://www.realgod.org/scientific_materialism/index.html">Why Be Blinded by Science and Materialism</a>.&#8221; I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll all be convinced that scientific materialism just doesn&#8217;t cut it compared to, uh, &#8220;Greater Reality.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/02/03/the-institute-for-the-real-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dawkins interviews Derren Brown about psychics</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/01/27/dawkins-interviews-derren-brown-about-psychics/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/01/27/dawkins-interviews-derren-brown-about-psychics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paranormal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superstition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=1405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is Richard Dawkins interviewing Derren Brown about psychics and cold reading:

If you like Derren Brown, be sure to check out his Trick of the Mind TV series and his awesome book, Tricks of the Mind.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is Richard Dawkins interviewing Derren Brown about psychics and cold reading:</p>
<p><!-- Smart Youtube --><span class="youtube"><object width="590" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xswt8B8-UTM&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xswt8B8-UTM&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="590" height="355" ></embed><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object></span></p>
<p>If you like Derren Brown, be sure to check out his <a href="http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsites/D/derrenbrown/tvshows/trickofthemind/">Trick of the Mind</a> TV series and his awesome book, <em><a href="http://amazon.com/o/ASIN/1905026358/unreasonablefaith-20/ref=nosim/">Tricks of the Mind</a></em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/01/27/dawkins-interviews-derren-brown-about-psychics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural</title>
		<link>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2008/10/08/an-encyclopedia-of-claims-frauds-and-hoaxes-of-the-occult-and-supernatural/</link>
		<comments>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2008/10/08/an-encyclopedia-of-claims-frauds-and-hoaxes-of-the-occult-and-supernatural/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.wordpress.com/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just noticed that An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural by James Randi and Arthur Clarke is online for free. Lots of great reference material for when you need answers.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed that <span><a href="http://www.randi.org/encyclopedia/">An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural</a></span> by James Randi and Arthur Clarke is online for free. Lots of great reference material for when you need answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2008/10/08/an-encyclopedia-of-claims-frauds-and-hoaxes-of-the-occult-and-supernatural/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
